Maggie P. Fay, Susan Bickerstaff, and Hodara, Michelle (2013). Why Students Do Not Prepare for Math Placement Exams: Student Perspectives. (CCRC Working Paper No. 57). New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
As I continue to explore Developmental Education, I keep wanting to learn more about the placement process. Higher education is struggling with accurately placing students. And, this placement is ca critical factor the a student’s likelihood for degree and/or certificate attainment. Many factors contribute to this inaccurate placement, and this article tackles one of the issues – lack of student preparation.
Article Summary
The purpose of this article was to explore community college students’ experiences and attitudes toward placement tests. The study includes survey responses from 122 students at four community colleges as well as 34 students who participated in four focus groups at those same colleges. The community colleges are part of a community college system on the East Coast, and at the time of the study, this system decided to undertake new placement testing procedures and instruments. The students who participated in the study all tested into and were enrolled in developmental math in the fall 2012 semester.
The study concluded that there are four related reasons why students do not prepare for the math placement test. The reasons were explained as follows: Students’ misperceptions about the stakes of the placement exam, a lack of knowledge about test preparation materials, an unawareness of why and how to prepare for the placement exam, and a very low-level of confidence with their math abilities (Fay, Bickersaff, & Hodara, 2013).
The study provided recommendations for colleges regarding placement testing. It is recommended to create more student awareness about the importance of the exam, increase awareness of test preparation materials, and design materials that teach both what and how to study (Fay et. al., 2013).
Strengths and Critiques
Overall, the article is well-organized and is written at a very understandable level as it is trying to reach a wide audience of readers. The authors provided a coherent study as the research consistently focuses on the premise that lack of student preparation contributes to low placement test scores. But, the findings of the research do not necessarily contribute anything original to the field of developmental education. Furthermore, the study is limited as it only addresses math placement testing, not reading and English which are utilized nationwide as well. I was also disappointed that the article did not include a literature review.
Regarding their data collection methods, the researchers utilized student surveys and student focus groups. One way to improve and enhance this research would be to consider the timing of the surveys and focus groups. Students were surveyed after taking the placement test and receiving their scores. Results may be different if students were surveyed prior to taking the placement exam. I would also be interested in responses from students who did not test into developmental coursework. Did those students prepare? Did those students receive the same information and had the same level of awareness as students who tested into developmental education? Finally, greater attention could be paid to those students who testing right out of high school versus those students who had been away from school for two or more years.
The findings are logical, but not necessarily significant. The finding regarding the correlation between self-confidence and placement tests was one I had not read before. I am not aware though if these findings were revealed during the survey itself, or during the focus group responses. Also, I am unable to determine how many students indicated this lack of self-confidence. The conclusion was logical, although it is difficult to determine the frequency of responses that indicated a lack 0f self-confidence with math prior to testing. I would recommend including more specificity as to how this conclusion came to be.
My Take
I found this research did provide me with greater insight into the placement test process. I am aware from my experiences at Glendale Community College that students do not prepare for the placement exam. GCC , and many of the Maricopa colleges, are similar to the colleges discussed in the study as materials are prepared and offered to students. But, test preparation materials are not necessarily promoted. They are available on our web site, but a student would have to seek them out to prepare in advance for the exam. This research confirms that it is imperative that community colleges put forth much more effort to create and to disseminate test preparation materials for incoming students.
This article also reinforced for me the need to communicate the ‘high-stakes’ of the placement exam to incoming students. The authors state that, “staff members’ attempts to allay students’ anxiety about placement testing (i.e., by telling students not to worry about the exam) contributed to students’ tendency not to prepare and may have served to understate the stakes of the exam” (Fay et. al., 2013). My experiences also confirm this finding. GCC staff members, nor our print materials, communicate the importance of the placement exam. Students need to have a greater understanding of the consequences – a strong understanding that their placement matters. Most students surveyed indicated they did not realize there was even a concept of developmental courses, and they were not aware the results of this exam could place them into below college-level course work.
The survey did reveal a finding that was one I had not considered. Most articles and research I have read focus on the anxiety students have regarding math, and that anxiety impacts performance in college coursework. However, I have not considered the effect of low self-confidence with math skills on the placement exam. The study revealed findings that students “were worried about placing into a course that would be too difficult” (Fay et al., 2013). And, students reported being satisfied with their placement in below 100-level courses. The implications for this finding are two-fold in my opinion. First, much of the communication leading up to the placement exam does not address student fears, anxiety, or low self-confidence. Furthermore, the test preparation materials are primarily delivered on-line, and again, do not address a lack of confidence for the student. As community colleges develop test preparation materials and as some embark on the test preparation workshop, it is critical that these materials and courses in some manner address the students’ lack of confidence.
To build on this research, I believe you could expand the study to include attitudes and perceptions of students regarding the English and reading placement exams. Are student perceptions about those tests the same? Do students have the same lack of confidence as displayed in the math results? Another way to build on the research is to explore this lack of confidence further. Specifically, students completed this survey after having taking the placement exam, and after having already enrolled and started their developmental coursework. I would want to explore whether students had the lack of confidence prior to the placement exam, or was this lack of confidence fueled or reinforced by a poor placement test score and subsequent placement into a developmental course.